|
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -1- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
Society of Actuaries Course 8RU Fall 2003
**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION 8**
COMPREHENSIVE SEGMENT – U.S.
MORNING SESSION
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
1. (7 points) A NOC executive with 30 years of service plans to retire one year from now at
age 62. It is important to NOC that the executive transitions to retirement over the next
four years.
(a) Describe the benefit incentives that can be offered to help retain this executive.
(b) If you were hired by this executive, provide your recommendation regarding the
negotiation of benefits.
(c) Explain how your answer to (a) would be different if the executive had only eight
years of service with NOC.
(d) Identify the additional considerations that would exist if, instead of being hired by
the executive, you were hired by NOC to provide advice to the executive.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -2- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
2. (11 points) On June 30, 2003, NOC purchased a non-participating annuity contract to
cover the obligations of all the pensioners in the Full-Time Hourly Union Pension Plan.
You are given:
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;The contract cost was $125 million.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;As of June 30, 2003, NOC has recorded half of its 2003 pension expense and
contributed half of its 2003 contribution.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;A discount rate of 6.0% was appropriate on June 30, 2003.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Valuation results as of June 30, 2003, immediately before the annuity purchase:
Using a 6.5%
Discount Rate
Using a 6.0%
Discount Rate
(All dollars in 000’s)
PBO
Active participants $377,000 $400,000
Deferred vested participants 0 0
Pensioners 103,000 108,000
Total PBO $480,000 $508,000
Service Cost $24,000 $28,000
Market value of assets $320,000 $320,000
Average remaining service period 11.5 11.5
(a) (5 points) Calculate the pension expense for the year 2003. Show all work.
(b) (1 point) Describe the additional considerations if a participating annuity contract
were purchased.
(c) (3 points) Explain how your answer to (a) would differ under IAS 19 and the
rationale for the different requirements.
(d) (2 points) Describe the information NOC will have to provide the insurer for the
purpose of obtaining a quote for the annuity contract.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -3- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
3. (6 points) NOC’s Board of Directors has established the following funding policy for
NOC’s DB ERPs: annual contributions equal to normal cost plus five-year amortization
of unfunded actuarial accrued liability. The CFO of NOC is concerned about the
volatility of funding policy contributions.
(a) Explain the effects of different asset valuation methods on this volatility.
(b) Explain the effects of different asset class allocations on this volatility.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -4- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
4. (12 points) The law in Vosne has been changed to permit voluntary employee
contributions of up to 5% of pay to a DC ERP. The tax treatment of these contributions
is the same as for contributions to a PPA.
NOC has decided to change the Full- Time Hourly Union Pension Plan from a flat dollar
plan to a final average earnings plan, and to add a DC ERP for the union employees.
The main provisions of the new plans are:
DB ERP
Normal retirement benefit: 1% of final five-year average earnings
times years of service
Post retirement indexing: 3% per year
Optional form of benefit:
Lump Sum
The other provisions of the plan are the same as those in the NOC Full-Time Hourly
Union Pension Plan.
DC ERP
Employee Contributions: Voluntary
Matching Employer contributions: 100% match on the first 3% of employee
contributions
Form of Benefit: Lump sum or periodic pension
(a) Critique the design of the new plans from the perspective of NOC.
(b) Critique the design of the new plans from the perspective of the hourly union
employees.
(c) Assess the current hourly plan asset allocation for the new DB plan.
(d) Describe the considerations in setting investment options to be offered to
participants in the DC ERP.
(e) Predict the socio-economic effects of the change in the law in Vosne.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -5- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study5. (6 points) NOC has just established a global subsidiary. Employees of the subsidiary
include transferred NOC employees and third-country nationals.
(a) Explain the issues affecting a retirement benefit policy for permanent and
temporary transfers between countries.
(b) Assuming that global comparability of retirement benefits is a corporate
objective, describe the issues NOC must consider.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -6- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
6. (10 points) NOC’s CEO has proposed an asset mix policy for the Full-Time Hourly
Union Pension Plan to achieve the following objectives:
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Minimize short-term volatility of the company’s pension expense.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Minimize the long-term cost of the plan.
Proposed Asset Mix Policy
Domestic Equities (mostly oil companies) 60%
International Equities 5%
Domestic Fixed Income (short %26amp; medium-term
treasuries)
20%
Real Estate 15%
(a) Critique the proposed asset mix policy.
(b) You are going to perform an asset liability study for the NOC Full-Time Hourly
Union Pension Plan. Describe the inputs you would need and the process you
would undertake.
(c) Explain how the output of your asset liability study would be used to recommend
and justify an asset mix policy to the CEO.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -7- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Afternoon Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
7. (8 points) NOC is acquiring TechCo, a private company in the country of Xanadu.
Xanadu has similar tax and pension legislation rules to Vosne, with the following
exceptions:
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Employees can contribute up to $5,000 per year to a DB ERP and $5,000 per year to
a DC ERP.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Employee contributions are tax-deductible to the individual.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Investment earnings on the employee contributions are not taxable until withdrawn.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;There are no PPAs.
Xanadu sponsors the following government-provided retirement income program:
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Both employees and employers contribute 5% of pay every year.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;The pension provided at retirement is equal to 50% of the best 3-year average
earnings, provided the contributory period was at least 30 years. A proportionately
reduced benefit is provided if less than 30 years of contributions were made to the
program.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;Eligibility for a pension is age 62.
%26#8226;%26#61472;%26#61472;The pension is reduced by 5% per year that the retirement age precedes age 67.
TechCo did not provide either a DB ERP or a DC ERP.
(a) Evaluate the appropriateness of NOC establishing an ERP for the salaried
employees of TechCo.
(b) NOC’s VP of Human Resources is proposing a plan with the same provisions as
the Full-Time Salaried Pension Plan. Critique this proposal.
(c) Recommend
an alternative program for the salaried employees of TechCo.
Justify your recommendation.
**END OF EXAMINATION**
MORNING SESSION
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -8- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Afternoon Session
**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION 8**
COMPREHENSIVE SEGMENT – U.S.
AFTERNOON SESSION
All Questions pertain to the Case Study8. (8 points) NOC is considering laying off part of its union workforce to reduce costs. In
order to avoid layoffs, the union has agreed to discuss changes to the Full-Time Hourly
Union Pension Plan.
NOC has proposed to freeze accruals in the pension plan as of September 30, 2003.
Under the frozen plan, benefits would be determined for all active participants based on
service earned through September 30, 2003, and no future benefits would accrue.
The union offers a counter proposal to reduce future accruals as of January 1, 2004.
Under the union’s proposal, benefits would accrue to December 31, 2003 at the $75 rate.
After December 31, 2003, benefits would accrue at a rate of $50 per year of service
earned after December 31, 2003.
(a) Estimate the change in NOC’s 2003 accounting expense if NOC’s proposal is
adopted.
(b) If the union proposal is adopted, estimate the change in the 2003 and the 2004
accounting expense.
(c) Describe the effect of NOC’s proposal from both the employee and the employer
perspectives.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -9- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – U.S.
Afternoon Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
9. (15 points) NOC is purchasing a refinery from ABC Company, and will offer
employment to all of the employees at the refinery. All refinery employees are members
of the ABC Refinery Pension Plan and the ABC Refinery Post-Retirement Medical plan.
There are no other memb[1] [2] 下一页 |
